|
|
 |
Remarriage Finances Part 7: Special Financial Issues To Consider Before Remarriage--Estate Planning |
| |
Remarriage Finances: Planning For A Family Merger--Not A Hostile Takeover
Part 7--Getting Started As A Remarriage Couple:
Special Financial Issues To Consider Before Remarriage--Estate Planning
By: Joseph Warren Kniskern, Esq.
In the previous article of our continuing series on financial issues, we considered general matters most couples face before remarriage begins--the "getting to know you" and financial planning stage of entering into a lifelong partnership. In this article (and the next one to follow) we will see how different and unique remarriage issues often change our goals and plans.
Remarriage is a complex mix of many personalities and financial issues. You cannot just consider income and expenses of the remarried couple in isolation. The couple needs to manage money coming from different purses, and often going into several different households. Into the mix is the past good and bad credit of each spouse and former spouses, good and bad spending habits of current and ex-spouses, and financial liabilities of all these individuals, just to name a few! Also thrown in are child-support payments, retirement plans, and college funds of children and stepchildren--not to mention all of the additional costs for food, day-care, entertainment and so many other daily expenses which test the strength of the blending family. It can be a monetary minefield!
Here are a few of the most important considerations:
Remarriage Estate Planning. How will your assets be passed along to your current spouse, children from your current and former marriages, and perhaps even your former spouse? The only way to know is by completing some estate planning.
Yes! Estate planning is a topic we'd rather not think about because it reminds us of our mortality. It is even more challenging to plan for the death of a remarriage partner before you marry! But then you hear the horror stories. Ana summed up the problem well, as she recalled her husband's sudden death from a heart attack at age 37: "No one wants to talk about how a survivor will sort out the details of a sudden death. I know I didn't. When my husband died, he had no Will and was underinsured. We both knew these were two areas we would eventually resolve, but we never did. Neither of us ever expected the other to die so young. If only I had prepared. If only I had followed the advice of our lawyer and our accountant." But the unfortunate fact is that three out of four Americans die without a Will. Financial planners estimate that approximately half of all Americans also are underinsured, or not insured at all. This lack of preparation can be devastatingly costly at a time of emotional upheaval, but especially with the additional complexities of a blending family!
Estate planning establishes long-term goals for managing, maintaining, and augmenting our assets and wealth in the event of our death. We plan for the most efficient and productive way to establish financial security, reduce taxes, and preserve what the Lord has blessed us with, for those loved ones who survive us. We do this through the use of gifts, wills, trusts, insurance policies and many other methods. This critical planning work is not only for wealthy individuals--everyone has a responsibility to exercise sound financial planning for the maximum benefit of the family.
• Wills. One basic element of estate planning is to have a Will. This document provides assurance that your property will be distributed as you wish upon your death. If a person dies without a Will, which the law refers to as dying "intestate", his or her assets will be distributed according to applicable state law. And if the State decides how your property is going to be distributed, the odds are quite good that it will not be the way you would have wanted it to happen!
Too many couples entering remarriage have not even looked at their existing Wills. Imagine their surprise when they discover their Wills have not been changed since prior to their divorce--leaving their ex-spouse as the sole beneficiary of their estate!
Not only does a Will provide you with an opportunity to designate how your property is to be distributed, but it also allows you to select a trusted person or bank to act in your place as an "executor" or "personal representative" and to make decisions on matters after your death which are consistent with what you might want to do. Even more importantly, your Will states who should have custody of your minor children. However, if the other biological parent is still living and is not an unfit parent under the law, that parent will gain custody in most cases--notwithstanding the active daily parenting by a stepparent. (See our discussion of adoption and rights of stepparents in Chapter 9 of Making A NEW Vow for more information.)
Even so, you can still include specific child custody instructions in your Will. Why is this important? Because your ex-spouse may die before you do, or he or she may fail, neglect, or refuse to assume custody of your child even if the law allows it. Therefore, it is always important to have a guardian appointed in your Will, showing your intent, in case the other biological parent does not serve as custodian for any reason.
This situation uncovers a financial issue as well. Given the likelihood that your child may be turned over to his or her other biological parent in the event of your death, you may still want your child to benefit from your estate. However, you may not feel comfortable placing any of your estate assets into the hands of your ex-spouse. Therefore it is important to set up a trust for your child, and to name a trusted person to serve as trustee, to ensure estate assets do indeed go to your child. Without a trust, any money left to your child winds up in a court-directed guardianship proceeding--another very costly and time-consuming process! More importantly, a judge you have never met will decide how your money will be spent on your child. No thanks! In addition, without a trust, guardianships in many states end, when the child becomes a legal adult--still very young in years and maturity. What might your child do if he or she receives a large sum of money at that young age? Can you spell "Porsche"? For these and other reasons, it may be best to establish a trust for your child, protecting the money from your ex-spouse, and protecting your child against his or her own immature inclinations.
• Probate. A Will must be probated at death. That means that when you die, your Will must be taken to your local county courthouse for a court supervised procedure, necessary to establish what you own, and determine who has the right of possession as you directed. The probate process also oversees payment of the taxes, claims and expenses of your estate. After all these probate procedures are completed, what remains of your assets is distributed to your beneficiaries. But probate is a costly and time-consuming process. Probate fees average approximately one to six percent of your estate (depending upon whether a Will contest occurs), with the average probate procedure taking many months to complete. A Will is a one-way ticket to the probate court. Consequently, depending upon the State involved, some remarried couples may want to plan their financial affairs in ways to avoid the probate process, if possible--especially if the process in your State is long and expensive.
• Living Trusts. One way to avoid probate is to have a living trust. You transfer your estate assets to your living trust, but nothing changes except for the title to those assets. Your life continues as it did before, with you having complete control over all of the assets in your living trust. When you die, a successor trustee that you select takes over your trust and can immediately distribute your assets, rather than wait for a long probate process to be completed. A word of caution here: Make sure your successor trustee is competent and trustworthy. Probate courts investigate and qualify personal representatives under Wills--no such court verification procedure is required in most instances for the successor trustee of a living trust.
• Durable Family Powers of Attorney. Remarriage partners also need durable family powers of attorney in favor of a trusted agent(s) who will have authority to handle a spouse's financial affairs if he or she is unable to do so. A surviving spouse usually will be handling most of the family expenses upon any disability or death of the other spouse. This means making sure that the surviving spouse, or another trusted family member, has signing privileges on critical checking accounts and access to safe deposit boxes in order to keep the family afloat.
• Estate and Gift Taxes. Part of estate planning also involves taking advantage of the tax laws. The Tax Reform Act of 1976 combined gift and estate taxes into a single tax applicable to gifts made during our lives, or estate inheritance transfers made to others upon our deaths. The massive Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 also made numerous changes, which reduces applicable estate taxes over a period of years. The tax laws keep changing. Therefore, proper estate planning and compliance with the changing law keeps the amount of taxes paid to the IRS to a minimum. Your benefactors will enjoy more of what you want to give or bequeath to them.
The estate tax is a tax on the act of transferring property at your death--not a tax on the right of your beneficiaries to receive their inheritance. Your estate pays the tax. Therefore, the value of your property going to your beneficiaries will be reduced by the amount of tax that your estate pays. The good news is that every estate is allowed a deduction against the estate tax. This excludes some of your assets from estate tax liability. In 2001, the amount excluded was $675,000, meaning that if your estate was worth $675,000 or less, it may not be taxed at all on the Federal level. (States also may have inheritance taxes, so be sure to check with your estate planning advisor about planning for this additional expense.) Beginning in 2002, the exclusion amount gradually increases until it tops off at $3.5 million in 2009. You may think that you are not wealthy enough to exceed these thresholds, but once the value of retirement plans, equity in your home, and especially life insurance proceeds are added in, the value of your estate rises very quickly.
As part of this estate planning process, many couples establish revocable living trusts to reduce their tax obligations. They also set up their estate plans to take maximum advantage of a "unified credit" against estate taxes by having property in an amount equal to this credit transferred at the death of a spouse to a trust (usually called a by-pass or credit shelter trust), with the balance of the estate transferred to the surviving spouse to minimize or even avoid estate tax until the surviving spouse dies.
• Estate planning for blending families. Yes, estate planning for remarried couples is unique--especially for those with a blending family. Typical "simple Wills" will not work in most situations involving a remarried couple. Why? Because most "standard Wills" assume that both spouses have only been married once, with all children born of that marriage, and with the couple considering everything they own as "theirs". These typical Wills further assume that each spouse's primary desire at death is to provide for the surviving spouse. In addition, estate planners counseling a couple in a traditional marriage, will have a goal of eliminating or postponing payment of estate taxes. This may work against the interest of biological children, as we shall see. The fact is that remarriages should not be treated as traditional marriages in estate planning considerations, especially when children exist from a prior marriage.
What are some of the problems remarried couples face in estate planning? Risk of misunderstanding provisions in Wills and trusts easily can arise unless the preparer of these documents carefully defines the intent of the spouses. For example, it is very customary for a parent to make special bequests to that parent's biological children in a Will. However, if that parent's Will only makes reference to the bequests going to "my children", the executors of the estate may think that the parent meant to also include the remarriage partner's biological children. This could be especially true if, for example, the parent raised the other spouse's children from infancy. This may not be what the decedent wanted. Therefore it is best to be clear and definite in one's estate planning documents. This may mean stating, "my biological children, meaning Susan and Jack only" to avoid any misunderstandings.
Sometimes a remarried spouse wants jewelry or antiques to remain "in the family", meaning with biological children. If a parent is not specific and clear about who will receive this valuable property, it may go to the stepparent, and eventually to his or her own biological children. These matters must be carefully addressed in all estate planning documents.
It is not unusual for a biological parent's children to resist accepting a stepparent as "their parent". This becomes important when their biological parent dies, since the children will view this event as the time to receive their inheritance. If the biological parent leaves this inheritance in trust for his or her children, but giving the stepparent spouse the right to receive income from that trust for the spouse's life (a "marital trust"), this effectively postpones the children's inheritance. Result? It could create many potential misunderstandings and emotional conflicts between children and stepparent. This is especially true when the stepparent is younger than the child's biological parent. In these situations, postponing the child's inheritance until after the stepparent's death has almost the same effect as disinheriting the child--particularly if the inheritance does not vest until the child is well into retirement. Also, the stepparent and biological child of the deceased spouse are tied to each other for life through the existence of the marital trust, even if it is not in their mutual best interest to continue the relationship.
There are ways to work around this problem, however. For example, it may be appropriate for the biological parent to give the stepparent a certain sum of money and/or a specific asset, while allowing the biological children to receive everything else. If this is not enough for the stepparent to maintain his or her lifestyle, life insurance on the biological parent's life could make up for the difference. (But be careful--estate taxes due on the biological parent's death could reduce the actual amount of life insurance proceeds received by the stepparent! In all events, always be sure to check with your estate planner or tax advisor on the various options first.)
Another way to direct your inheritance to your biological children is for each parent to set up a separate trust for their own children and to transfer their personal assets into the trust before remarriage. Each parent then names his or her own biological children as the beneficiaries of that parent's own trust. In most states, the children then will inherit the assets after their respective parent's death. In the meantime, each parent can enjoy the benefits of his and her respective trust as specified in their individual trust agreements.
Trying to balance the interests of biological children and stepparent spouses does not come easy--especially when estate tax implications are considered. Prior to 1982, remarried spouses were on the horns of a dilemma--did they leave their assets to the surviving spouse? That avoided paying some estate tax, but created problems with the children by postponing their inheritance. Or did they ignore the marital deduction against estate taxes and pass along everything to the children? Fortunately, Congress recognized this dilemma and enacted legislation permitting a transfer estate tax deduction, if the decedent's estate is passed into a "QTIP Trust". A QTIP Trust, which is properly qualified under the IRS Code, allows a spouse to make sure that his or her surviving spouse receives a lifetime income. But after that spouse's death, the trust assets will pass as directed by the Will or other instructions of the first spouse--typically to the first spouse's biological children. Be careful about this option as well, however, since certain features of this type of Trust may not be appropriate for all remarried spouses.
• Selection of trustees. Many estate plans use trusts to manage assets, pay income, and pass along wealth to children. With remarried couples, it is often more prudent to have the trustee of these trusts be someone other than the surviving spouse. This is often necessary because of the inherent conflicts of decision, arising in how trust assets and income are best utilized--sometimes to the detriment of the children.
With a stepparent as trustee, children who are beneficiaries of the trust may be suspicious about the stepparent's objectivity and neutrality. The opposite also can be true. Children should not be trustees of a marital trust for the benefit of the stepparent, since partiality may exist and suspicions interfere with effective trust administration. Similar conflict of interest concerns arise with giving trust beneficiaries the power to remove trustees and select replacement trustees. In selecting a replacement trustee, it may be wise to require both the surviving stepparent spouse and the children to agree on the trustee candidate. Be sure to check with your estate planner or tax advisor about all these factors as well.
Usually, corporate trustees and banks provide the best alternative (provided that the administration fees are reasonable and affordable). However, a trusted family friend also may serve as a good compromise trustee candidate, if he or she can resist pressure from the beneficiaries when difficult choices must be made.
In our next article, we will investigate other vitally important financial issues such as housing, administration of retirement plans, social security benefits, coordination of insurance, titling of joint and separate assets, as well as support and liability issues with ex-spouses.
Next: Special Financial Issues For Couples To Consider Before Remarriage--Housing, Retirement, Insurance, And Ex-Spouses.
Joseph Warren Kniskern is a Christian attorney, mediator, and author of "When The Vow Breaks: A Survival and Recovery Guide For Christians Facing Divorce," and "Making A NEW Vow: A Christian Guide To Remarriage And Blending Families," both available from Broadman & Holman Publishers, Inc. in Nashville, Tennessee.
Last Revision Date: Monday, December 17, 2007 © 2007 Joseph Warren Kniskern--All Rights Reserved
|
#1: by Geoff on 08.18.2008 @ 01:00pm CDT
What happens when a remarried parents will can not be located, and an annuity names the stepmother as the person to receive a large amount of money? Does the remainder of the annuity pass to the step children once she dies? |
|
|
#2: by Warren Kniskern on 08.18.2008 @ 09:24pm CDT
Greetings, Geoff--
Thanks for your comment! Unfortunately, you haven't provided enough information to allow for an informed general answer to your question. Which remarried parent has the lost will? Who created the annuity, and for what purpose? What are the terms and conditions of the annuity? Was the stepmother the surviving spouse of a deceased biological parent of the step-children? Was the stepmother remarried to someone else after the death of the biological parent? Did the stepmother have any legally enforceable will or trust in place at her death? If so, what did those document(s) provide? Did the stepmother have biological children of her own upon her death? These are just a few of many questions prompted by your inquiry.
There are just too many variables at play here to respond. In addition, a lot depends upon the laws of the state in which the stepmother and the step-children reside. These state laws can vary, depending upon the applicable jurisdiction.
There are some limited scenarios in which the unpaid remainder of an annuity in favor of a stepmother could survive and transfer upon her death to her step-children. To see if any such scenario applies in the fact pattern you have provided, however, it would be best to go through all of the details with a qualified estate planning lawyer licensed to practice in the state where the stepmother resided upon her death.
Warren |
|
|
#3: by lynn on 10.06.2008 @ 03:01pm CDT
Is there any tax benefit to getting remarried after inheriting a large sum of money? |
|
|
#4: by Warren Kniskern on 10.13.2008 @ 09:33am CDT
Thanks for your question, Lynn! (Please forgive my delay in responding. I have been out of the country for the past 2 weeks or so.)
I wish I could answer your question specifically, but it really is difficult to do so due to many variables that could affect one's tax position going into a remarriage. Each person's tax situation could be radically different on a Federal and State level and, of course, discussing personal legal and tax factors in a forum like this really isn't appropriate. So the best course of action is to discuss your particular situation with a competent tax advisor in your State.
In all events, those receiving inheritances prior to remarriage do have some significant planning considerations to address, as outlined in my series of articles on remarriage finances. Is the inheritance going to be preserved as non-marital property, or will the applicable assets be commingled and/or managed in such a way that this property becomes joint marital property? If the inheritance property is held as separately owned income producing property, will the spouse/owner pay tax on that income without using marital funds to do so? Will the inheriting spouse want to leave this property to children from a prior marriage upon death, or also include children from the other spouse? What about chlldren born during the remarriage?
The most important focus is to sort out and reach mutual agreement on all of the options PRIOR to remarriage, with the assistance of capable financial advisors, so an element of certainty is established going into the new relationship, while minimizing unrealistic and conflicting expectations and hurtful misunderstandings later on. |
|
|
#5: by sherry on 05.17.2009 @ 03:05am CDT
Is it standard practice for an estate planner or attorney to make a remarried couple aware of the special considerations when making a will that involves a biological adult child?
Given that the adult child is worthy, typically, how is the estate divided between step parent and bilogical child?
Thank you. |
|
|
#6: by Warren Kniskern on 05.18.2009 @ 03:48pm CDT
Thanks for your inquiries, Sherry. To answer your first question, anyone handling the estate planning for a remarried couple in a stepfamily situation absolutely should make the couple aware of all legal and other special considerations affecting all minor and adult children--be they biological or stepchildren.
As to your second inquiry, I'm not certain what you mean by the phrase, "...adult child is worthy...". I will assume you are referring to an adult biological child of one of the remarried spouses who is otherwise qualifed to receive an inheritance from that spouse/parent pursuant to a valid Will. Since the child is no longer a minor (which could affect the transfer of homestead rights in some states, for example), and given that your question does not describe an intestate situation (that is, a situation where no Will is involved, in which case all of the deceased's property would be transferred in accordance with applicable state statutes for descent of estate property), the deceased spouse/parent's estate still may be subject to the rights of his/her surviving spouse to inherit at least a minimum share of the decedent spouse's estate. In addition, automatic transfer of jointly held property would occur as a matter of law. The point here is that some state laws could override one's Will and provide that some estate assets must go to particular family members (usually surviving spouses and custodians for minor children--not necessarily adult children). Beyond overriding legal requirements such as these (which obviously vary from state-to-state), however, the deceased spouse/parent's Will should control as to who receives proportionate shares of the remainder of the estate. There is no "typical" way of making this division, as it really depends upon the preferences and desires of the deceased spouse/parent as expressed in the Will. Some prefer to give more to their surviving spouses. Others may feel the surviving spouse has received enough consideration, and elect instead to devise the balance of their estate assets to their children. Your estate planning advisor should be able to provide you with full details based upon the state where you live and your particular preferences. |
|
|
#7: by Sherry on 05.22.2009 @ 01:05pm CDT
Thank you very much for your answer and website Mr.Kniskern. Really, I guess what I was trying to determine, is if my feelings are based on an accurate perception of what commonly occurs. I was hoping that I might be wrong. |
|
|
#8: by Heidi on 07.02.2009 @ 08:57am CDT
My question is what if in remarriage, the husband had two adult children, and the former wife received most of their former jt assets in of a divorce settlement (which should pass to the 2 biological children upon death of the ex-spouse), and the during the length of the remarriage, i.e., 20-30 years, the couple had no children together (and the new wife never had children), the couple accumulated a small amount of assets and real estate, can the biological father leave a specific dollar amount to his 2 adult biological children at death (if he is first to die) with remainder of assets to be transferred to his current spouse, if so outlined in a Will and/or TRust? Then upon her death, the remainder of the estate (what is left) would pass to her own adult family members or charities of her choosing? In other words, the 2 biological children will each have received a cash distribution upon the death of their biological parent, but then that is it, and the surviving spouse is no longer responsible to deceased husband's adult children? Reason I am asking is that the remarried biological father and myself have accumulated only a small meager amount of savings together, and he has very little life insurance (less than $50K), and we have a small home with a remaining mortgage. He is elderly, retired, I am still working, and will be able to support myself in his death, but object to dividing what small amount of assets we have built up together between 2 adult step-children who have no relationship with either of us. I am worried about them coming back after his death, contesting for more money over and above the specific $ amount they will receive, and me having to sell our home to divide assets with them. If his Will specifically states if either of them contest the $ amount he wishes to distribute to them, then they shall receive $10, is that sufficient to hold up in a Probate Court? |
|
|
#9: by Maria Yu on 09.22.2009 @ 01:23pm CDT
My parents had a living trust drawn up years ago. Last year my mother passed away and this year my father remarried. As far as I am aware I was made the executor for the living trust should something happen to my dad.
My concern is the remarriage part....how much weight does my step mother have on the existing living trust and can the trust be contested by her should things not work out to her advantage? |
|
|
#10: by Warren Kniskern on 09.22.2009 @ 03:31pm CDT
This belated response is to Heidi's question above on July 2, 2009. (Please forgive my tardiness, Heidi--I just learned of your questions today!)
The short answer to your initial question is generally yes, a biological parent can provide for a specific portion of his/her estate to go to children from a prior marriage, as long as the widowed spouse receives that spouse's share of the estate under the laws applicable in the decedent spouse's state.
Regarding your second inquiry as to whether adult children from a prior marriage of the decedent spouse can come back for more from the surviving spouse, there is nothing really to keep them from attempting to challenge their parent's death provisions. But if the parent provides for his/her adult children (not minor children, in other words) and makes it clear that the provision made is complete, then it is unlikely that these adult children could get an additional share in assets going to the widowed spouse beyond what the decedent spouse specifically provided. Upon the death of the widowed spouse, there also would be no obligation to make additional provision to these adult children unless he/she wanted to do so as a direct bequest, for example. |
|
|
#11: by Warren Kniskern on 09.22.2009 @ 03:44pm CDT
This response addresses Maria's question on September 22, 2009 above.
In a trust, if the original trustee becomes deceased, the trust generally provides for appointment of a successor trustee. You did not state who was the original trustee on the trust for your father, and it sounds like you are uncertain as to whether you are qualified to serve as a trustee under his trust now.
But let's assume that your father has a living trust, and that you currently are the trustee of that trust. Your father's spouse by remarriage may be entitled to a specific share of your father's assets as a matter of law in the state where your father is domiciled at his death. So that has to be accounted for in some manner. Beyond that, the terms of your father's trust would govern how the trust assets are to be managed and distributed. If your father wanted to provide for additional assets to his widowed wife, that probably would have to be specifically provided for in the trust to be valid. Nothing will prevent your father's widowed wife from attempting to challenge the trust provisions, of course. But the likelihood of success would not be great if the trust, for example, did not specifically provide for her to receive the benefit of the trust.
Again, many of the factors affecting this matter could be governed by state law. Therefore it is very important to check in with a estate lawyer in the state where the trust is operational to see if the facts in your particular case might lead to a different result. |
|
|
#12: by KJB on 01.14.2011 @ 09:26am CST
My mother is 88, married to step-father who is 90. They have been married over 27 years. Both have children from previous marriages. I just found out that all money that my step-father has is in a trust for his children. My mother would only get half of his pension and her social security when he dies. Leaving her unable to live in assisted living or stay in the condo that they live in. He also will leave half the condo in her name and half in his trust. She would have to buy the other half from the estate. He probably has 3 million in his trust. She will have about $40,000 in savings left in her name. How can we change this so she will be left in comfortable financial situation? He said that her kids would just have to take care of her. Can a trust be fought after the death of a spouse? It seems he is more worried about leaving his kids with money than his wife. He did have holdings in stocks and bonds before the marriage. Thanks for your help. |
|
|
#13: by Doris Nita on 03.11.2011 @ 01:45pm CST
I live in California, I have a living trust established before remarriage and my biological adult children are successor trustees. I have a prenuptial agreement with my current spouse that indicates my real property, individual bank accounts and earned income will be my separate property. I intend to leave most of my assets to my biological adult children and part of my 401K and all joint accounts to my current spouse. My questions are:
1. Do I need to update my living trust after remarriage?
2. Does prenuptial agreement protect my children from my current spouse take half my assets away when I die? |
|
|
| Required fields are denoted by asterisks * . |
|
|
|
|
|
|